She argued that having them go through an additional licensing process to verify those credentials is often unnecessary and slows down hiring - especially if a board can’t meet every month because it lacks a quorum.Īn earlier study committee advised against LNA licensing reforms Health care organizations, for instance, already require those credentials when hiring medical imaging and radiology professionals and many states don’t require licensure on top of that, she said. He said many of those licenses “are already duplicated at the national level through various certifications.”Ĭourtney, the OPLC director, said private certifications through professional associations are enough to protect consumers in many cases. ![]() “It is understanding - though unfortunate - that some of the professions that have operated for years under protectionist fiefdoms are now upset that Governor Sununu is breaking down barriers to employment, reducing red-tape, lowering costs, and increasing commonsense.” “The idea that removing certain licenses lowers standards is categorically false,” he said. Chris Sununuīen Vihstadt, a spokesman for the governor’s office, pushed back on those concerns in a statement. “But licensure isn't the barrier at all.”īen Vihstadt, spokesman for Gov. "There's no doubt that for a lot of professions, especially the natural resource professions, that we have a shortage of young people coming into our community or our industry,” she said. In her view, the quality of forestry has gone up since licensing was implemented. “And so I think you need professionals that are educated, experienced and held to a standard.” It’s really about taking care of a very complex system,” she said. “Taking care of forests just isn't about cutting trees and removing a commodity. She was disappointed to see it on the chopping block. ![]() Karen Bennett, a retired forester, helped set up the licensing process for that profession. When asked for comment on the preliminary details about the governor’s proposals, professionals in some fields expressed concern that removing licenses could lower standards. Why? Why do you need to be licensed to plant trees?” Sununu told NHPR this week that he sees some of the state’s requirements are unnecessary or outdated - asking why sports agents, for instance, needed licenses. The proposal would also get rid of licenses for certain medical occupations, including for licensed nursing assistants, medical technicians and various jobs related to medical imaging and radiology. Sununu also wants to repeal 34 professional licenses, including wetland and soil scientists, foresters, athletic agents, barbers and cosmetologists within an already licensed facility, landscape architects and “ hawkers and peddlers.” ![]() The three separate boards that now regulate alcohol and substance-use counselors, psychologists and other mental-health professionals, for instance, would be rolled into one Board of Mental Health Practice. The proposal would also make some professional licensing boards advisory and eliminate or combine others. “The State’s licensing requirements should not impose unnecessary barriers to workforce opportunities or be the reason someone decides not to move here,” Lindsey Courtney, the office’s executive director, said in the release.Īmong other changes, it would establish universal license recognition, allowing professionals in good standing in other states to quickly obtain licenses in New Hampshire. The proposal comes after the state’s Office of Professional Licensure and Certification (OPLC) reviewed more than 50 professional licensing boards and various requirements, looking for ways to improve efficiency and lower barriers to entering the workforce, according to a news release announcing the proposed changes. NHPR The governor proposed repealing 34 professional licenses, including foresters.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |